The UK aspires to become a crypto hub, but its progress in formulating comprehensive blockchain policies has been slow. While there are indications of movement towards structured regulation, recent developments reveal fintech company Revolut is adjusting its cryptocurrency services for UK business clients by ceasing crypto trading to comply with new regulatory requirements. This move precedes the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) new rules on January 8, with the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation potentially making it an appealing destination for global crypto companies.
In contrast, the EU is evolving into a hub for international crypto companies, with major players like Robinhood and Coinbase establishing or expanding their presence. The EU’s progressive crypto regulations, including the MiCA rules, have attracted various crypto companies, fostering a crypto-friendly environment. This trend contrasts with the UK, which has adopted more restrictive measures, presenting challenges to its ambition of becoming a crypto hub.
The FCA’s recent updates to crypto marketing regulations, effective from January 8, aim to integrate consumer protection measures into promotional activities. These changes, including a mandatory cooling-off period and a prohibition on incentives, have led to reactions from major fintech companies like Revolut and PayPal, highlighting the delicate balance between innovation and consumer protection in the evolving crypto sector.
Revolut’s strategy reflects a careful navigation of diverse regulatory environments, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance in the fintech sector, especially in rapidly evolving areas like cryptocurrency. The UK’s regulatory challenges present both opportunities and obstacles for fintech companies operating in its dynamic financial ecosystem.
By FCCT Editorial Team
, an independent military force, and allied militias in Sudan raped several dozen women and girls in West Darfur’s capital, El Geneina, and those fleeing to Chad between late April and late June 2023, Human Rights Watch said today. The assailants appear to have targeted people because of their Massalit ethnicity and, in some cases, because they were known activists.){kind=link}